The recent Upper Tribunal case of Chowdhury (Extended family members: dependency) [2020] UKUT 188 (IAC) confirms that extended family members of EEA nationals must prove that their dependency on their EEA... read more →
Last year we posted about the case of R (Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2019] EWHC 452 (Admin) in which the... read more →
As many applicants and immigration practitioners know, the Home Office can often make questionable decisions or subject Applicants to painstaking delays in deciding applications or issuing residence documents; as was... read more →
We received some delightful news in the busy Christmas period that our clients Ancestry indefinite leave to remain applications were granted. This was a significant victory because there were notable... read more →
In the recent Court of Appeal case of R (Suny) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2019] EWCA 1019, it was held that the Secretary of State made... read more →
The recent Court of Appeal case of Palla v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2019] EWCA Civ 264 (“Palla”) heard on 20 February 2019 confirms the position and... read more →
Over the last 18 months, the Home Office has heavily relied on paragraph 322 (5) of the Immigration Rules to refuse Tier 1 General indefinite leave to remain applications where... read more →
The recent High Court case of R (Sri Lalithambika Foods Limited) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2019] EWHC 761 (Admin) is another important lesson for Tier 2... read more →
Success Story: Indefinite Leave to Remain Long Residence reconsideration approved by the Home Office
We recently received some delightful news that our client’s (the “Applicant”) indefinite leave to remain reconsideration had been approved by the Home Office and she had been granted indefinite leave... read more →
Last month, the Supreme Court unanimously allowed the appeal in the case of Rhuppiah v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2018] UKSC 58 (“Rhuppiah v SSHD”). The case... read more →
